Thursday,  Feb. 20, 2014 • Vol. 16--No. 219 • 32 of 46

(Continued from page 31)

school boards.
• Senators passed the measure 29-5.
• Public and private school boards delegate some of their authority to the association, which is considered a non-profit, non-governmental organization.
• The association's board recently passed its own open meeting's policy.
• The bill would open to the public meetings and records from the association and regular reports to the Legislature's Government Operations and Audit Committee. The proposal goes next to the House.

SD lawmakers reject bill limiting payday lending
CHET BROKAW, Associated Press

• PIERRE, S.D. (AP) -- A South Dakota legislative panel on Wednesday rejected further restrictions on payday loans and other short-term lending, so the bill's sponsor vowed to take the issue to the voters.
• The House Commerce and Energy Committee voted 11-2 to defeat the measure, with some committee members saying supporters should continue negotiating with industry representatives to find a compromise.
• But the legislation's main sponsor, Rep. Steve Hickey, said industry representatives helped write the measure after they became alarmed last year by his effort to put a proposed law on a statewide ballot to cap interest rates for short-term loans. Those same industry officials opposed the bill in Wednesday's hearing, so Hickey said he will start a new effort to put an interest cap on the 2016 ballot.
• "I keep my word. I'm going to the ballot," the Sioux Falls Republican said after the hearing. "This is all a game. Those people expressly told me to put this stuff in the bill and now they are opposing it."
• Hickey said such loans are designed to be renewed, or flipped, multiple times to trap borrowers.
• "I believe it's exploiting the poor and the elderly and those on the economic fringes of our society," Hickey said.
• The bill rejected by the committee would not have limited interest rates for short-term payday loans, title loans or signature loans. Instead, it would have imposed additional state regulations and limited the size of loans based on a borrower's ability to repay.
• Current law puts a limit of $500 on a short-term loan or the total balances of all loans made by a lender to a customer. Hickey's bill would have changed that to $700, but the loan or a borrower's monthly payments could not have exceeded 25

(Continued on page 33)

© 2013 Groton Daily Independent • To send correspondence, click here.