Tuesday,  February 19, 2013 • Vol. 14--No. 215 • 22 of 25 •  Other Editions

(Continued from page 21)

way of doing things, right down to the rotary-dial telephone he said he was using in a conference call with reporters.
• But the 75-year-old Indiana farmer figured out a way to benefit from a high-technology product -- soybeans that are resistant to weed-killers -- without always

paying the high price that such genetically engineered seeds typically bring. In so doing, he ignited a legal fight with seed-giant Monsanto Co. that has now come before the Supreme Court, with arguments taking place Tuesday.
• The court case poses the question of whether Bowman's actions violated the patent rights held by Monsanto, which developed soybean and other seeds that survive when farmers spray their fields with the company's Roundup brand weed-killer. The seeds dominate American agriculture, including in Indiana, where more than 90 percent of soybeans are "Roundup Ready."
• Monsanto has attracted a bushel of researchers, universities and other agribusiness concerns to its side because they fear a decision in favor of Bowman would

leave their own technological innovations open to poaching. The company's allies even include a company that is embroiled in a separate legal battle with Monsanto over one of the patents at issue in the Bowman case.
• The Obama administration also backs Monsanto, having earlier urged the court to stay out of the case because of the potential for far-reaching implications for patents involving DNA molecules, nanotechnologies and other self-replicating technologies.
• ___

Retrial hearing for Drew Peterson highlights fight: current attorneys vs. former lead lawyer

• CHICAGO (AP) -- Drew Peterson's defense lawyers were a united, wisecracking front during most of the former suburban Chicago police officer's 2012 trial, and rarely without their dark sunglasses. But by the time Peterson was found guilty of killing his third wife, the counsel's bond was irreparably fractured.
• The public verbal sparring between former lead trial counsel Joel Brodsky and colleague-turned-nemesis Steve Greenberg will come to a head Tuesday at a hearing in Will County. The defense plans to argue that Peterson deserves a new trial because Brodsky botched the first.
• If Will County Judge Edward Burmila rejects the motion for a retrial, he has said he will move on to the sentencing phase. Peterson, 59, faces a maximum 60-year prison term for murdering Kathleen Savio, who was found dead in her bathtub with a

(Continued on page 23)

© 2012 Groton Daily Independent • To send correspondence, click here.