Monday,  October 29, 2012 • Vol. 13--No. 104 • 22 of 41 •  Other Editions

(Continued from page 21)

thal injection procedure.
• "The law has spoken," he said. "I killed. I deserve to be killed."
• Just hours after Becky's private memorial service in Sioux Falls, Curl and her husband had packed up their belongings and moved to Lake Luzerne, N.Y. She said she soon lost control of her life.
• "Right after Beck was murdered, I started drinking every day," she said. "I drank from the time I woke up to the time I passed out at night." She has dealt with a series of health problems, suffering a heart attack and quadruple bypass in 2003.
• She said she hopes her trip back to Sioux Falls to watch Moeller's execution will help still the memories of her daughter's haunting crime scene photos.
• "I picture them every day in my head," she said.

High court weighs new look at voting rights law
JAY REEVES,Associated Press
MARK SHERMAN,Associated Press

• WASHINGTON (AP) -- Three years ago, the Supreme Court warned there could be constitutional problems with a landmark civil rights law that has opened voting booths to millions of African-Americans. Now, opponents of a key part of the Voting Rights Act are asking the high court to finish off that provision.
• The basic question is whether state and local governments that once boasted of their racial discrimination still can be forced in the 21st century to get federal permission before making changes in the way they hold elections.
• Some of the governments covered -- most of them are in the South -- argue they have turned away from racial discrimination over the years. But Congress and lower courts that have looked at recent challenges to the law concluded that a history of discrimination and more recent efforts to harm minority voters justify continuing federal oversight.
• The Supreme Court could say as early as Monday whether it will consider ending the Voting Rights Act's advance approval requirement that has been held up as a crown jewel of the civil rights era.
• The justices sidestepped this very issue in a case from Texas in 2009. In an opinion joined by eight justices, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote then that the issue of advance approval "is a difficult constitutional question we do not answer today."
• Since then, Congress has not addressed potential problems identified by the court. Meanwhile, the law's opponents sensed its vulnerability and filed several new lawsuits.

(Continued on page 23)

© 2012 Groton Daily Independent • To send correspondence, click here.