|
(Continued from page 26)
• Freeman def. Dell Rapids St. Mary, 25-17, 17-25, 27-25, 23-25, 15-9
• Groton Area def. Langford-Roslyn, 25-17, 25-17, 25-10
• Kimball def. Lyman, 26-24, 25-18, 23-25, 25-14
• Madison def. Hamlin, 25-18, 26-24, 25-19
• Marion def. Freeman Academy, 25-16, 25-17, 25-12
• McCook Central/Montrose def. Baltic, 25-21, 25-21, 25-14
• Mobridge-Pollock def. McLaughlin, 25-13, 26-24, 25-4
• Tri-Valley def. Garretson, 25-8, 25-8, 25-19
• Viborg-Hurley def. Hanson, 25-20, 25-22, 21-25, 21-25, 15-11
• Wagner def. Tripp-Delmont/Armour, 25-11, 25-10, 25-15
• Wakpala def. Tiospaye Topa, 25-14, 25-12, 25-22
• Wall def. New Underwood, 25-21, 25-21, 25-21
• West Central def. Parkston, 25-21, 25-15, 19-25, 26-24
•
SD tribe's lawsuit against beer stores dismissed
GRANT SCHULTE,Associated Press
• LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- A federal judge dismissed an American Indian tribe's lawsuit Monday that blamed beer makers and nearby stores for chronic alcoholism on an impoverished South Dakota reservation, saying the case belonged in state court but gave a subtle nod to the tribe's claims.
• The lawsuit was filed by the Oglala Sioux Tribe, which governs the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, where alcohol is banned. Four beer stores named in the suit sold the equivalent of 4.3 million 12-ounce beer cans last year even though they're in Whiteclay, a Nebraska town with about a dozen residents on the reservation's border.
• "There is, in fact, little question that alcohol sold in Whiteclay contributes significantly to tragic conditions on the reservation," U.S. District Judge John M. Gerrard wrote in his ruling. "And it may well be that the defendants could, or should, do more to try to improve those conditions for members of the tribe.
• "But that is not the same as saying that a federal court has jurisdiction to order them to do so."
• The judge dismissed the case without prejudice, meaning the tribe could take its claims to state court.
• The tribe's attorney, Tom White of Omaha, said he had not yet discussed the ruling with his clients or decided how they would proceed, but added: "I would just point out that the judge had every opportunity, if he wanted to, to say this is a spuri (Continued on page 28)
|
|
