Saturday,  August 25, 2012 • Vol. 13--No. 042 • 20 of 34 •  Other Editions

(Continued from page 19)

• Hitchcock-Tulare 42, Northwestern Area 0
• Ipswich/Edmunds Central 38, Highmore-Harrold 0
• Irene-Wakonda 44, Menno 7
• Kimball/White Lake 38, Mt. Vernon 14
• Langford 36, Sunshine Bible Academy 12
• McCook Central/Montrose 12, Platte-Geddes/Dakota Christian 7
• Mobridge-Pollock 18, Linton, N.D. 14
• New Underwood 60, Rapid City Christian 16
• Newcastle, Wyo. 30, Custer 14
• Oakes, N.D. 20, Britton-Hecla 9
• Parker 52, Baltic 20
• Plankinton 60, Lower Brule 6

• Sioux Falls Roosevelt 49, Aberdeen Central 8
• Sully Buttes 58, McLaughlin 8
• Tea Area 41, Bon Homme 6
• Todd County 51, Crow Creek 0
• Tri-Valley 41, Canton 23
• Viborg-Hurley 50, Gayville-Volin 14
• Warner 22, Wolsey-Wessington 8
• Waubay/Summit 20, Florence/Henry 0
• Waverly-South Shore 54, Great Plains Lutheran 12
• West Central 35, Vermillion 0
• Winner 39, Parkston 0
• POSTPONEMENTS AND CANCELLATIONS
• Edgemont vs. Kadoka Area, susp.
• White River vs. Wall, ppd.
•

Report says how to avoid sage grouse protections
BEN NEARY,Associated Press

• CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) -- Conservation groups are welcoming a federal report spelling out how sage grouse should be managed in 11 Western states to avoid new federal protections.
• The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's draft report issued Thursday advises states and federal land management agencies to act immediately to "stop the bleeding of continuing habitat and population losses."
• The report is certain to command attention in Western states where listing sage

(Continued on page 21)

© 2012 Groton Daily Independent • To send correspondence, click here.