Friday,  August 17, 2012 • Vol. 13--No. 0334• 12 of 39 •  Other Editions

Excerpts from recent South Dakota editorials
The Associated Press

Argus Leader, Sioux Falls. Aug. 13, 2012
Teacher evaluations shouldn't be a threat
• It's no secret that it is difficult to measure the success of teachers, because they can inspire and mold students in so many ways.
• They teach the mysteries of math, the intricacies of science and the complexities of reading and writing. Success or failure in those subject areas traditionally have been measured with standardized testing. But many teachers also instill a love of learning, guide students into future careers, build self-confidence, watch out for their well-being and share the concern that comes from a caring adult. Those things tend to be priceless, immeasurable.
• In South Dakota, as in the rest of the states, our schools are going to attempt to rate teachers based on test scores and more. The leader of a work group coming up with a system for the state has told education leaders it is going to take time to judge teachers, the time of teachers and their administrators.
• By the 2014-15 school year, South Dakota teachers will be judged as distin

guished, proficient, basic or unsatisfactory. Ironically or not, those categories are similar in nature to how students have been judged under No Child Left Behind.
• The group developing criteria is asking schools to provide annual formal and informal observations and a peer observation. The state is working on a way to train every school principal on how to evaluate teachers using the Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching.
• The process will add

(Continued on page 13)

© 2012 Groton Daily Independent • To send correspondence, click here.